Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 0:04:55 GMT -5
If 2 subtitles are of the same importance, it is possible to have 2 h2 tags. On the other hand, you only need an h1 tag (title). Results of the test: 36% of articles that have H2/H3 tags have better performance, both in terms of traffic, shares and backlinks. So, according to this test, the best structured articles are also those which have the best potential to perform. In conclusion: what should you do to publish an article that has the best chance of performing? You need a long article: more than 3,000 words. You need an article with a long title: more than 14 words. The title must suggest that we will find practical information there: lists, advice, instructions for use. The article must be well structured, including subtitles. Objectively, even without being a hyper technical SEO specialist, there is nothing extravagant in these elements.
Indeed, we learn that: Longer texts perform better: no wonder. On the one hand there Email Data is probably a richer semantic field and therefore better referencing. On the other hand, it's long so we tell ourselves that we will have an answer and explanations. Not everyone is satisfied with an answer, many want to understand. Longer titles work better. It's just as logical. As I indicated above, reading the title gives the impression that we will have details. Titles that have a catchy word such as list, advice, instructions, work better. Again this is very logical. The Internet user will be more attracted by this type of hook. Better structure produces better results. This is probably a slightly more technical impact of SEO.
However, you should not imagine that because you write an article of 3 20 words on: the 10 good tips to implement immediately to have content that performs (15 words) you will immediately obtain a score extraordinary. The findings of this Semrush study are only statistical findings and there are dozens of counter-examples with content of less than 500 words that will work very well. I know this and it is not very useful to comment by writing a comment like “I don't agree, I have written articles of 300 words which are hits”. It's useless because we know it. This study, like many others, gives averages. The averages there are those who are in it, and those who are not there (by definition). Saying: “I was a hit with 300 words” adds nothing to the debate. Especially if it only happened once.
Indeed, we learn that: Longer texts perform better: no wonder. On the one hand there Email Data is probably a richer semantic field and therefore better referencing. On the other hand, it's long so we tell ourselves that we will have an answer and explanations. Not everyone is satisfied with an answer, many want to understand. Longer titles work better. It's just as logical. As I indicated above, reading the title gives the impression that we will have details. Titles that have a catchy word such as list, advice, instructions, work better. Again this is very logical. The Internet user will be more attracted by this type of hook. Better structure produces better results. This is probably a slightly more technical impact of SEO.
However, you should not imagine that because you write an article of 3 20 words on: the 10 good tips to implement immediately to have content that performs (15 words) you will immediately obtain a score extraordinary. The findings of this Semrush study are only statistical findings and there are dozens of counter-examples with content of less than 500 words that will work very well. I know this and it is not very useful to comment by writing a comment like “I don't agree, I have written articles of 300 words which are hits”. It's useless because we know it. This study, like many others, gives averages. The averages there are those who are in it, and those who are not there (by definition). Saying: “I was a hit with 300 words” adds nothing to the debate. Especially if it only happened once.